Octelligence vs. Athennian: entity management, honestly compared.

Athennian is the established enterprise entity-management platform for large law firms and corporate departments. Octelligence is the modern alternative, with published pricing, self-serve sign-up and cap table included, designed for mid-sized firms and accountants managing client corporations. This page compares the two honestly on features, pricing, and fit.

See the comparison
Updated May 2026. Verify vendor claims before committing.
At a glance
Price gap

Octelligence's self-serve plans and per-entity add-ons have published prices that start well below Athennian's enterprise contracts.

Best fit

Athennian for Am Law / national firms with 1,000+ entities. Octelligence for mid-sized firms managing 25-500 client corporations.

Scope

Octelligence includes cap table + share certificates in the base product. Athennian's cap-table module is a separate add-on.

Same audience, different bets.

Both Octelligence and Athennian serve the same buyer: law firms and accountants managing portfolios of client corporations. Both handle entity records, corporate filings, and director/officer changes across many entities. Both pitch the same problem: managing client minute books on shared drives doesn't scale past a handful of entities.

The differences are in scope, price, and target customer. Athennian targets the enterprise, Am Law firms, Big Four accounting, large in-house corporate departments. Their pricing reflects this: enterprise annual contracts, with implementation projects spanning months. Octelligence targets the broader middle market: mid-sized firms, regional practices, and accounting offices managing 25-500 client corporations, with published plan pricing that's accessible without enterprise procurement.

Octelligence also includes cap table management, share certificates, and equity scenario modeling in the base product. For firms whose clients want a unified records + cap table view, this matters. For firms that already have a separate cap-table workflow (Carta, Pulley, etc.), it matters less.

  • Implementation and onboarding

    Athennian implementations are typically 3-6 month enterprise projects with dedicated consultants. Octelligence's self-serve plans are set up by your own team, without an implementation project.

  • Pricing model

    Athennian uses annual enterprise contracts negotiated per customer. Octelligence publishes its plans (Starter, Growth, Scale and Intelligence) and per-entity add-on prices, with self-serve sign-up on every plan, billed monthly or annually. Enterprise is a negotiated contract.

  • Cap table inclusion

    Octelligence ships cap table management in the base product. Athennian's cap-table capability is a separate module priced separately. For firms managing equity for their clients, this affects the all-in cost meaningfully.

  • Geographic depth

    Both platforms work with US, Canadian and UK companies. Athennian started in Canada and has additional depth in less-common international jurisdictions. Octelligence is built for US and Canadian firms and the corporations they serve, with templates in US or Canadian wording, including groups with entities in both.

  • Partner ecosystem

    Athennian has a developed partner network (Dentons, Deloitte, etc.) with formal integrations. Octelligence's partner program is newer but designed for mid-sized firm participation.

How to choose between them

The decision usually comes down to scale and budget. Here's the breakdown by use case.

  • Number of client corporations. Octelligence plans include between 1 and 15 entities, and you can add entities to any plan as your client list grows. At 500+, both are credible options; price comparison matters most.
  • Budget per entity. Octelligence publishes its per-entity add-on prices ($35/mo on Scale, $40/mo on Intelligence), so you can work out the cost before talking to sales. Athennian quotes per customer.
  • Cap-table needs. If your firm or your clients need cap-table management, Octelligence includes it. With Athennian, factor in the add-on cost.
  • Implementation timeline. If you need to be operational in weeks not months, Octelligence's self-serve onboarding is faster. Athennian's enterprise process is more thorough but slower.
  • Integration requirements. If you have deep document-management or PMS integrations (NetDocuments, iManage), Athennian's enterprise integrations are more established.
  • Risk tolerance. Athennian is the conservative enterprise choice, established vendor, large customer base. Octelligence is the newer alternative, faster moving, less established but more accessible pricing.

Per-entity economics drive most decisions.

The single biggest practical difference between Octelligence and Athennian is the per-entity cost. Athennian's enterprise pricing makes economic sense for firms managing thousands of entities, the platform's depth justifies the investment at scale. For firms managing 25, 100, or 300 entities, the per-entity cost can be punishing.

Octelligence's published plans are built for this band. Scale includes 5 entities and Intelligence includes 15, and you can add entities to either plan at a published per-entity price as the client list grows. Enterprise is negotiated for contract-defined capacity. The aim is to make structured entity management viable for firms that wouldn't otherwise have an option besides shared drives.

  • Octelligence Scale

    5 entities included, more at $35/mo each. Self-serve, billed monthly or annually. Published pricing on the website.

  • Octelligence Intelligence

    15 entities included, more at $40/mo each. Self-serve, billed monthly or annually. Published pricing.

  • Octelligence Enterprise

    Contract-defined capacity and dedicated onboarding, agreed with the Octelligence team.

  • Athennian

    Enterprise contracts. Pricing not published; quote-based. Expect enterprise-scale annual commitments and a procurement cycle.

Athennian is broader on entity management. Octelligence is broader on records + equity.

The two platforms emphasize different things. Athennian's depth is in entity management, handling complex corporate hierarchies, multi-jurisdiction filings, large-scale compliance workflows, and detailed audit trails across thousands of entities. The platform's strength is at the high end of complexity.

Octelligence's strength is in the integrated record: structured minute book + share register + cap table + verifiable share certificates, all in one platform with the audit trail tying them together. For firms whose clients want a unified records-and-equity view of their corporations, this matters. For firms that already have separate equity workflows, Athennian's entity-management depth may matter more.

  • Athennian's strengths

    Multi-jurisdiction depth, large-portfolio scale, enterprise integrations (PMS, DMS), corporate-hierarchy modelling.

  • Octelligence's strengths

    Integrated records + equity, QR-verified certificates, transparent pricing, faster onboarding.

  • Both handle well

    Per-entity minute books, registers, resolutions, share certificate generation, filings calendars.

  • Neither replaces

    Tax preparation software, full document management systems, or large-scale e-billing.

Octelligence vs. Athennian side-by-side

Drawn from each vendor's public website as of May 2026. Verify before committing.

 OctelligenceAthennian
Target customerMid-sized firms, 25-500 client corpsEnterprise firms, 1,000+ entities
Pricing modelPublished plans plus per-entity add-onsEnterprise contract, quote-based
Pricing transparencyOn the websiteNot published
Cap table includedYes, in base productSeparate add-on
Share certificatesQR-verified, includedAvailable as feature
Implementation timelineSelf-serve setup, no implementation project3-6 months typical
Self-serve onboardingEvery self-serve planNo, enterprise sales
Multi-jurisdictionUS, Canada, UKUS, Canada, UK + international
Partner ecosystemGrowingEstablished (Dentons, Deloitte, etc.)

Pick the platform that fits your firm size and budget

Both are credible. The right choice depends on which side of the firm-size and budget question you're on.

Pick Athennian if you're enterprise

Am Law firm, Big Four, large in-house corporate department managing 1,000+ entities. The enterprise integrations and partner ecosystem justify the cost at scale.

Pick Octelligence if you're mid-sized

25-500 client corporations, growing practice, budget-conscious, want cap table included. Choose Scale for transaction evidence and history, or Intelligence for relationship and structure tools, and add entities as the client list grows.

Pick Octelligence if you need cap tables

Many Athennian customers also use Carta or Pulley for cap table. If you'd rather have one platform, Octelligence's integrated approach is cleaner.

Pick Athennian if you need deep CA/international

Less-common international jurisdictions, complex multi-country structures, deep partner ecosystem — Athennian has more depth here.

Pick Octelligence if speed matters

Need to be operational this quarter. Octelligence's self-serve sign-up beats a 3-6 month enterprise rollout.

Pilot before committing either way

Both vendors allow some form of trial or pilot. Take any material annual commitment through a 30-day pilot with real client corporations, not a demo.

Common questions

Often, for the firm sizes Octelligence targets. Athennian sells enterprise annual contracts and does not publish pricing. Octelligence publishes its plan prices and its per-entity add-on prices, so you can price your client list before a sales call. Get a quote from both for your specific situation and compare against current published prices.

Possibly. Once your firm is managing 1,000+ entities with complex multi-jurisdiction structures and deep PMS integrations, Athennian's enterprise platform may be the better fit. Octelligence's sweet spot is 25-500 entities. Above that, the comparison becomes specific to your situation.

Yes. Octelligence supports bulk import from structured exports. Athennian's export formats are standard enough that the data moves cleanly. The harder migration is usually the change-management, getting your team off Athennian's workflows. Plan for a 60-90 day overlap.

Athennian has more established enterprise integrations (NetDocuments, iManage, common PMS). Octelligence is building this layer but is less mature here. If deep integrations are essential to your workflow, this is a real difference. If you're flexible on integrations, both work.

Both are professional-grade. Athennian is the established enterprise vendor with the longer track record. Octelligence is newer but built specifically for the corporate-records use case (not retrofitted from another category). Pick based on fit, not perceived prestige.
Octelligence plans for firms managing client corporations.

Published prices, self-serve onboarding, cap table included. Compare Scale, Intelligence and Enterprise.

Compare plans See how it works