Best cap table software for law firms and accountants in 2026
Cap table and corporate records software scored for firms managing 25 to 500+ client corporations: portfolio licensing, branded workspaces, multi-client management, billing flexibility, and audit-grade controls. Most cap-table tools are built for a single corporation; the few that serve firms do it on radically different terms.
At a glance: Best by firm profile
Firm-specific decision criteria
Portfolio pricing model
Per-corporation pricing breaks at scale: a firm managing 100 client corporations pays 100 subscriptions, manages 100 logins, and has no firm-level dashboard. Portfolio pricing collapses this into one firm-level account with provisioned workspaces. Octelligence offers explicit Portfolio Licensing at firm-friendly per-corporation rates. Athennian uses enterprise pricing. Carta Law has a firm-tier. Most cap-table tools (Pulley, Mantle, Eqvista, Cake Equity) have no firm model.
Branded workspaces
Firms want to present the software under the firm's brand: firm logo on the workspace, custom URL, firm-styled certificates, firm-named support email. This matters when the firm positions the software as part of its services rather than a third-party vendor relationship. Octelligence supports branded workspaces; most cap-table tools do not.
Multi-jurisdiction support
A firm's portfolio is usually multi-jurisdiction: Delaware C-Corps, federal CBCA, Ontario OBCA, BC, Quebec, UK Limited, plus various provincial and state combinations. Tools that serve a single jurisdiction (most US-built cap-table tools) force the firm to maintain multiple tools or fall back to manual records for the non-US clients. Octelligence supports 41 jurisdictions natively (CBCA + 10 Canadian provinces + 29 US states + UK).
Billing flexibility
Firms bill clients differently: some absorb the software cost into their services fee; some pass it through directly; some charge a flat governance retainer that includes software. The pricing model needs to support all three. Octelligence's Portfolio Licensing supports firm-billed, client-billed, and shared-cost arrangements. Other tools typically force one model.
Audit-grade controls
Firms need audit trails: who made each change, when, with what authority. Resolution drafting and signing, register entries, certificate issuance all need traceability per-client. Tools with strong audit logs and per-user signing authority support firm-managed work; tools with looser controls leave the firm exposed if a client later disputes a recorded action.
The products, scored for firms
Related guides and resources
- Best cap table software (general)
- Best cap table software for Delaware C-Corps
- Best cap table software for Canadian startups
- Best cap table software for UK startups
- Best corporate records software (broader category)
- Best minute book software
- For Law Firms & Accountants (Octelligence solution page)
- Portfolio Licensing (Octelligence)
- For paralegals (role guide)
- For accountants (role guide)
Frequently asked questions
What does portfolio licensing mean?
Portfolio licensing is a pricing and operating model designed for law firms and accounting practices managing many client corporations. Instead of each client corporation paying its own subscription, the firm pays a portfolio fee and provisions workspaces for each client under the firm's account. The firm controls the workspaces, handles billing centrally, and can apply firm-wide standards (templates, retention policies, branding). Portfolio licensing is distinct from a per-seat or per-corporation model in that the firm is the customer, not each individual client.
How is this different from a regular cap-table subscription?
A regular subscription is single-corporation: one company pays one fee. For a firm managing 25 or 500 client corporations, that model means 25 or 500 separate subscriptions, separate logins, separate billing, no firm-level controls. Portfolio licensing collapses this into one account with many workspaces. The firm sets the standards, the firm bills the clients (or absorbs the cost), and the firm has a single dashboard for compliance work across all clients.
What about branded workspaces?
Branded workspaces let the firm present the software under the firm's own brand: firm logo on the workspace, custom URL (firm.example), firm-styled certificates, firm-named support email. This matters for client relationships where the firm wants to position the software as part of its services rather than as a third-party vendor relationship. Octelligence supports branded workspaces; most cap-table tools (Carta, Pulley, Mantle) do not.
Do firms need cap-table software or corporate records software?
For most firms, both, because client corporations need both. The question is whether one vendor handles both well, or whether the firm needs to pair tools (one for cap table, one for records). Octelligence is one of the few that does both. Athennian focuses on entity records at enterprise scale (1,000+ entities) with weaker cap-table features. Carta Law adds firm features to Carta's cap-table strength but doesn't extend to the broader corporate record.
What about Diligent or Computershare?
Diligent Entities is enterprise entity management for very large law firms managing thousands of entities (mostly fortune 500 corporate-secretary functions); the price point is enterprise. Computershare is a transfer-agent business with corporate-secretary services, oriented around larger public-company or pre-IPO clients. Both are over-built and over-priced for a typical law-firm portfolio of 25 to 500 client corporations.
Branded workspaces, 41 jurisdictions native, audit-grade controls, billing flexibility. One firm account, every client under it.