Reference · 41 jurisdictions

Share certificate requirements across 41 jurisdictions

Share certificates (Canada and UK) and stock certificates (US) are the formal documents evidencing share ownership in a corporation. What must appear on them, whether they're mandatory at all, and how they're cancelled and reissued, each jurisdiction answers differently.

11 Canadian provinces 29 US states 1 United Kingdom

Same document, different names and rules

A corporation issues a share certificate (or stock certificate, in US terminology) to evidence that a specific shareholder owns a specific number of shares of a specific class. The certificate is not the share itself, the underlying ownership lives in the corporation's register, but it is the most visible and portable piece of evidence that ownership exists.

What goes on the face of the certificate, who must sign it, whether it must be issued at all, and how it is transferred or cancelled differs by jurisdiction. Most modern jurisdictions now permit uncertificated shares: the corporation may record ownership in its register without issuing physical certificates. Where certificates are issued, they remain governed by detailed statutory rules. This page surveys those rules across 41 jurisdictions.

Choose your jurisdiction

Each guide covers what to maintain, where to keep it, who can inspect, and what happens if you don't.

Canada

Canada (Federal / CBCA)

CBCA View requirements
Canada

Ontario

OBCA View requirements
Canada

British Columbia

BCBCA View requirements
Canada

Alberta

ABCA View requirements
Canada

Quebec

QBCA View requirements
Canada

Manitoba

MCA View requirements
Canada

New Brunswick

NBBCA View requirements
Canada

Newfoundland and Labrador

NLCA View requirements
Canada

Nova Scotia

NSCA View requirements
Canada

Prince Edward Island

PEIBCA View requirements
Canada

Saskatchewan

SBCA View requirements
United States

Delaware

DGCL View requirements
United States

California

Cal. Corp. Code View requirements
United States

New York

NY BCL View requirements
United States

Texas

TBOC View requirements
United States

Florida

FBCA View requirements
United States

Nevada

NRS Ch. 78 View requirements
United States

Washington

WA BCA View requirements
United States

Massachusetts

M.G.L. c. 156D View requirements
United States

Wyoming

WBCA View requirements
United States

Colorado

C.R.S. Title 7 View requirements
United States

Utah

URBCA View requirements
United States

Illinois

805 ILCS 5/ View requirements
United States

New Jersey

NJBCA View requirements
United States

Georgia

GBCC View requirements
United States

North Carolina

NCBCA View requirements
United States

Virginia

VSCA View requirements
United States

Arizona

A.R.S. Title 10 View requirements
United States

Tennessee

TBCA-TN View requirements
United States

Minnesota

Minn. Stat. § 302A View requirements
United States

Oregon

ORS Ch. 60 View requirements
United States

Michigan

MICA View requirements
United States

Ohio

OGCL View requirements
United States

Pennsylvania

PBCL View requirements
United States

Connecticut

C.G.S. § 33-600 View requirements
United States

Maryland

MGCL View requirements
United States

Indiana

IBCL View requirements
United States

Wisconsin

Wis. Stat. Ch. 180 View requirements
United States

Missouri

RSMo Ch. 351 View requirements
United States

South Carolina

SCBCA View requirements
United Kingdom

United Kingdom

CA 2006 View requirements

Compare requirements across jurisdictions

The same artifact, different rules.

JurisdictionGoverning statuteRequired to issue?Signing authorityUncertificated permitted?
Canada (Federal / CBCA) CBCA s. 49 Optional (s. 49(13), uncertificated permitted) One signature minimum (director, officer, agent) Yes (s. 49(13))
Ontario OBCA s. 56 Optional (s. 54, uncertificated permitted) Director/officer or agent Yes (s. 54)
British Columbia BCBCA s. 57 No, uncertificated by default Two directors/officers (or 1+1) Yes (and default)
Alberta ABCA s. 49 Optional (s. 49(13)) One signature minimum Yes (s. 49(13))
Quebec QBCA art. 67-72 Right exists; uncertificated permitted Two signatures (directors/officers) Yes (art. 70)
Delaware DGCL § 158 No, uncertificated permitted Two officers (specific combinations under § 158) Yes (§ 158, fully)
California Cal. Corp. Code § 416 Generally yes (uncertificated narrowly permitted) Two officers (specific combinations) Limited
New York NY BCL § 508 Optional (uncertificated permitted) Two officers (specific combinations) Yes (§ 508(c))
Texas TBOC § 3.202 Optional (uncertificated permitted) One officer minimum Yes
Florida FBCA § 607.0625 Optional (uncertificated permitted under § 607.0626) Two officers; facsimile permitted Yes (§ 607.0626)
Nevada NRS 78.235 Optional (uncertificated permitted) Two officers (president/VP + secretary/asst./treasurer) Yes
Washington RCW 23B.06.250 Optional (uncertificated under .260) Two officers (facsimile permitted) Yes
Massachusetts M.G.L. c. 156D § 6.25 Optional (uncertificated under § 6.26) Two officers Yes (§ 6.26)
United Kingdom CA 2006 s. 768-769 Yes, within 2 months (s. 769) Seal, or 2 directors / 1 director + secretary Yes (CREST for public; articles for private)

The shift to digital certificates

Across every jurisdiction surveyed below, the statutory rules were written for paper certificates handed to shareholders in person, often with embossed seals and signatures of officers in ink. Most statutes have been updated to permit electronic certificates, uncertificated shares, or both. The result is that modern private corporations have three choices: paper certificates (still legal, increasingly impractical), digital certificates with verification (the modern default), or uncertificated shares (recording ownership in the register only, no certificate issued).

The legal effect is the same in each case. What changes is the operational complexity of issuance, the ease of verification by buyers in diligence, and the resistance to fraud. Digital certificates with QR-based verification combine the comfort of a physical-looking document with the auditability of a digital record.

In Octelligence
Issue share certificates anyone can verify.

Octelligence issues QR-verified share certificates tied to the live share register. Every certificate carries a public verification page; cancellations and reissuances flow through the same workflow, so the certificate, the register, and the cap table never drift apart. Bulk issuance and revoke-and-reissue are supported across every jurisdiction we operate in.

See Share Certificates

Frequently asked

Are share certificates the same as stock certificates?

Yes, Canada and the UK use 'share certificate'; the US uses 'stock certificate'. The legal substance is identical: a document issued by a corporation evidencing ownership of a specific number of shares of a specific class. The Canadian, US, and UK statutes governing them differ in formal requirements but share the same core function.

Do I have to issue physical share certificates?

In most modern jurisdictions, no. Corporations may issue uncertificated shares (recording ownership in the register without issuing certificates) or digital certificates. Delaware (DGCL § 158), California, the CBCA, and the UK Companies Act 2006 all expressly permit uncertificated shares. Whether to issue certificates is a corporate decision, usually set in the bylaws.

What must appear on a share certificate?

Statutory requirements vary by jurisdiction, but common fields include: certificate number, corporation name and jurisdiction of incorporation, name of the shareholder, class and number of shares, par value (or no-par-value statement), date of issuance, and signatures of authorized officers. Restricted shares typically also carry a restrictive legend. See the jurisdiction guides below for jurisdiction-specific requirements.

How is a share certificate transferred?

The mechanics differ slightly by jurisdiction but follow a common pattern: the transferor signs over the certificate (typically with an endorsement or separate stock power), the corporation cancels the old certificate, issues a new certificate to the transferee, and updates the share register to record the transfer. Many jurisdictions require board approval for private-company transfers; others impose securities-law compliance obligations.

Verifiable ownership
Issue certificates that hold up across every jurisdiction.

QR-verified share certificates, public verification pages, and a register that always agrees with the certificate in hand.